Areas of Influence
Seven Overlooked Aspects of Writing a Grant Proposal
Writing a proposal for the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) can be a daunting prospect: a lot of time and energy is spent developing a project where the funding outcome is far from certain and much of it can feel outside of the project leader's control. As a former EPSRC portfolio manager, I’m afraid there is nothing I can say to guarantee a successfully funded grant … but I can discuss seven aspects of writing a proposal that are often overlooked but which can have a potential impact on your application. These include:
- Follow all of the instructions: This should be at the top of everyone's list when it comes to writing a competitive grant proposal ... but a surprising number of people forget to do it.
- Keeping all readers of the proposal in mind: A proposal is seen by a number of people on its way to a funding decision. Ensuring that each person (portfolio manager, reviewer, panel member) is considered during the writing process can be beneficial.
- Writing a strong response: Panel members use the reviewer comments and the applicant's response to determine how well a proposal meets the assessment criteria. A well-written response—one that is not angry, aggressive, arrogant, defensive, dismissive, or petty—can help a proposal move up the rank order list.
These topics and more are highlighted in this free session.
Your Instructor
Over the past two decades, Dr Elaine Massung has carried out a variety of roles in higher education: post-doctoral research assistant, copy editor and proofreader, and portfolio manager/panel convenor at the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. She started Academic Smartcuts to help students and academics clearly communicate their research and navigate the UK funding system.
Course Curriculum
Frequently Asked Questions
YOUR PASSPORT TO EXPLORING BEHIND THE SCENES: |